Picking the right path: In-house lawyers vs. consultants
We dug into the perspectives of both in-house employed lawyers and consultants to uncover what drives their choices and how they view their paths.
Interestingly, three respondents who had experienced both sides contemplated going back to in-house roles. They expressed concerns about being seen as less ambitious compared to their colleagues who had followed a traditional route with a well-known company.
Other respondents share a desire for steady, impactful projects, a sense of belonging to the company's culture, and a voice in shaping the organisation's direction.
“I sometimes miss saying that I’m X from Y’s legal department, and I wonder whether there’s a bias against contractors. Then again, maybe it’s all in my head, as many lawyers that I know have been more interested in what I’m doing now than in my previous role as an employed lawyer.”
Finding financial stability
Although respondents didn’t mention pay and benefits, there was a notable sentiment that contractors missed the financial stability that permanent employment offers. On the flip side, consultants value the flexibility they get to enjoy, allowing them to keep control of their own hours and agenda.
We asked an open question on the downsides of the contracting model, and there was no consistent theme. Respondents highlighted various issues, from administrative complexities like tax management to lack of job security and the difficulty of having a good work-life balance.
